The Electronic Intifada, Dec. 11, 2021
By Khuloud Rabah Sulaiman Since starting as an English teacher four years ago with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, UNRWA, Ahmed has found himself unable to freely publish stories or express his opinions online about Palestine and Israel’s occupation. “I used to publish stories for some international websites,” Ahmed, 28, told The Electronic Intifada, citing Mondoweiss [a virulently anti-Israel blog] among other online news sites that published his work. Like other UN staff interviewed for this article, Ahmed did not want to give his real name and the first name here is an alias. “I also used to express my support for the Palestinian resistance through Facebook, especially during the previous three Israeli attacks on Gaza and in many other events in all Palestine.” After his employment with UNRWA began, however, Ahmed said he was effectively silenced. And today, UNRWA, perennially underfunded, is under increasing scrutiny from international donors. So intense has the oversight become, Ahmed said, that he is thinking about deleting all his social media accounts in case he simply can’t restrain himself in the future. In July, the UN agency tasked with catering to the needs and rights of Palestinian refugees signed an agreement with the U.S., conditioning American financial assistance on a number of variables including the behavior of staff in UNRWA facilities and on social media. Shortly after in August, the pro-Israel group UN Watch — whose main purpose seems to be to attack UN bodies for any alleged bias against Israel – accused 22 UNRWA employees of online hate speech. The agency then suspended and launched an investigation into 10 employees. It’s had a chilling effect. “I cannot express my frustrations about current events in Jerusalem, the West Bank and even on the last Israeli onslaught on Gaza,” said Ahmed. For the same reason, he is also unable to participate in any national events and political activities or even to express his support for any of the Palestinian factions. CENSORSHIP“As long as I am working in this agency, I am forced to stop myself from likes, shares, or creating posts on any political issue, fearing for my job,” Ahmed told The Electronic Intifada. Married two years and with a baby son, Ahmed is acutely aware that he is unlikely to find a better paid job than with UNRWA because of the disastrous state of Gaza’s economy. One of Ahmed’s colleagues was one of the 10 suspended from work due to posts supporting the Palestinian resistance during the recent Israeli war on Gaza. “Every time I want to express my thoughts on current events in my country through social media, I remember what happened to my friend and stop myself,” he said. In announcing the investigation into its own employees, UNRWA said the 10 employees were suspended from work due to allegations that they had “engaged in non-neutral” behavior. On its website, UNRWA defines neutrality as an undertaking that “humanitarian actors must not take sides in hostilities or engage in controversies of a political, racial, religious or ideological nature.” UNRWA employees, in other words, under a strict interpretation of this principle, are deprived of their right to freedom of expression and their ability to participate politically regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through social media. In the past, this has meant employees’ political affiliations were taken into account. Now, a much stricter interpretation is taking hold. August’s UN Watch report accused more than 100 agency employees, going back to 2015, of ”promoting violence and anti-Semitism” in classrooms and on social media. UN Watch specifically named 22. Embarrassingly, however, UNRWA subsequently determined that of those, only 10 were actually among the agency’s 28,000 employees. The 10 have been suspended with pay pending the result of the investigation, UNRWA spokesperson Adnan Abu Hasna told The Electronic Intifada. The agency “attaches importance to the principle of neutrality, which is important to ensure the flow of funding from donors all over the world,” he said. |